| Hit Counter |
|
358781 Visitors |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Just Say No to Warrantless Searches!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the police are asking for your permission to search, you are under no obligation to consent. The only reason they are asking is due to the fact that they do not have enough cause to search without your consent. If you do consent you are waiving all of your rights provided to you under the Fourth Amendment. You will give up your right to an unreasonable search and seizure, in your home, your car or on your person. The protection against unreasonable searches and seizures that the Fourth Amendment provides to all citizens, in their homes, cars, and their persons, is an awesome one. Most courts have recognized limited exceptions to warrant requirements for searches. However, the courts do not dispense with the need to have a reasonable belief in the circumstances surrounding a search, i.e., they must be able to articulate "probable cause." The Fourth Amendment is a serious constraint on police conduct. Therefore, it is no small wonder that police prefer to conduct searches with the consent of the suspect. The Supreme Court requires a valid consent to be freely and voluntarily given and without coercion or duress exerted by police officers in obtaining the consent. A majority of avoidable police searches occur because citizens naively waive their Constitutional rights by consenting to warrantless searches. As a general rule, if a person consents to a warrantless search, the search automatically becomes reasonable and legal. Consequently, whatever an officer finds during such a search can be used AGAINST YOU! Don't expect an officer to tell you about your right not to consent. Police are not required to inform you of your rights before asking you to consent to a search. On the contrary, police officers are trained to use their authority to get people to consent and most people are predisposed to comply. If, for any reason, you don't want an officer digging through your personal belongings, you can refuse to consent by saying for example, "Officer I know you want to do your job but i do not consent to any searches of my private property."
You should never hesitate to assert your constitutional rights. Just say no! Never waive any of your rights without discussing the matter with an experienced criminal lawyer. |
|
 |
 |
| Newsflash |
| Don't ever let the police search your car, your home nor your person without a warrant. If they do so without your permission it can be litigated in court. Once you waive your rights that issue is gone forever. |
|
| Newsfeeds |
Weather Channel
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
BBC: World News
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
Dallas Morning News
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
AP Headlines
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
| WASHINGTON (AP) -- Legislation extending unemployment insurance for the long-term jobless faces a key test vote in the Senate, its momentum helped by about 60 popular tax breaks for individuals and businesses that expired at the end of last year.... |
| Senate to take up unemployment insurance extension |
| COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- A new Ohio State University custodial employee who received a bad job evaluation shot two co-workers in a campus maintenance building, killing one of them, and then fatally shot himself, officials said Tuesday.... |
| Ohio St.: Employee kills co-worker, then self |
| WASHINGTON (AP) -- The House's No. 2 Democrat is dismissing as "absurd" former Rep. Eric Massa's claims that he was forced out by party leaders because of his opposition to health care legislation.... |
| Dem leader calls Massa claims 'absurd' |
Al Dia Dallas,Texas
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
NPR Legal Affairs
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
 |
| The Justice Department is requiring the nation's largest voting machine company to sell off assets it acquired when it purchased its main competitor. The federal government and nine state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit saying the combination last September of Election Systems &Software and its biggest competitor harms competition. |
| Voting Machine Maker Ordered To Sell Some Assets |
| The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether the message of anti-gay protesters who show up at military funerals with inflammatory slogans such as "Thank God for dead soldiers" is protected by the First Amendment. |
| High Court Will Hear Anti-Gay Funeral Protest Case |
KRGV TV Rio Grande Valley
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:11
Texas Lawyer
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:21
| Randy Johnston discusses the State Bar Professional Ethics Committee's recent approval of a fee arrangement that would require a client to pay the client's lawyer's attorneys fees if the plaintiff who originally sued the client later joins the defense lawyer in the same suit. |
| Legal Malpractice: When a Plaintiff Sues a Defense Lawyer |
| Texas Lawyer senior reporter John Council and Randy Johnston discuss: Andrews Kurth's relationship with the Howard Hughes estate, and how some lawyers learned about success by working in fast-food places. |
| Reversed &Remanded, July 14, 2008 |
| Senior reporter John Council talks with criminal defense lawyer Gary Udashen about: a battle over exhibits in the Holy Land Foundation trial, when double jeopardy attaches in a prosecution, Darlie Routier's DNA test, and a proposal to limit attorney-client privilege in some cases. |
| Reversed &Remanded |
|
|
|